On spammers being a part of the main
Spare a moment for the Turing test — you remember: the one where the wily computer is supposed to get the best of human interlocutors by convincing them that it’s a person. The sci-fi romance version might have human interrogator falling in love with machine, then experiencing an existential crisis upon her discovery that the cultured, witty, romantic would-be paramour is not in the South Pasadena condo he gushed about but actually housed in a standard 19-inch rack in a chilly third floor lockbox of the new server farm in The Dalles, Oregon.
Reality may be a bit of a letdown, as usual, but it is here nonetheless and deserves a welcome.
Introducing (at least to BJS — I’d never gotten these before last week): pretty-damned-smart spam comments.
Let’s say you write a post on your blog, an obituary, as a matter of fact, one of the only serious pieces you’ve written in your life. You get some thoughtful comments and approve them as a matter of course. Then all of a sudden, you get this comment, a couple of weeks after the post:
You start to read it, thinking, “Great, it’s Klortho (long-time commenter on BJS). Let’s see what he has to say — whoa, that’s kind of weirdly empty, and what’s up with the misspelling? Not that I’d ever hold a misspelling against anyone, but he seems like the fastidious type and — huh?! why is Wordpress asking me to approve this in the first place? It’s only supposed to ask for approval on someone’s first comment, and — hey did he start a new blog? Oh, what the– ‘mining stock’?!”
Well, yeah, so you probably got the joke faster than I did. Clearly the miners are looking for gold among the famously well-off patrons of BJS.
It wouldn’t be worth a mention except that there was a similar one a few days later — also tied to the obituary. Come to think of it, it’s still not worth blogging off topic. But since you’ve made it this far, allow me to leave you with the five As, the progressive stages of a spam reactionary:
5. Astonishment – is this really a fake?
4. Apoplexy — yeah, admit it, they get under your skin. How dare they presume to think you would be interested in making a vast fortune off of penny stocks or in increasing her pleasure.
3. Awe – was this really done by a machine?! Oh, yeah, I see — they can program to look for keywords that would indicate obituaries, then pick up the screen names of other commenters, then put in some boilerplate appropriate for an obituary…
2. Adaptation – you know, this is really not a bad idea. If they would just do A, B, and C it would be almost impossible for people to tell that this was really spam…
1. Acceptance – not just acceptance that spam is a part of life. This means acceptance that we have met the spammers, and the spammers are us. Spammers and the recipients of spam, after all, are just two instantiations of the same thing: desire run amok. Sure, we may be smart enough to realize that we won’t end up slim and sexy by buying our diet pills for six cents on the RMB from a Russian pharmacy. We may be savvy enough to avoid sure-to-win stock tips found in blog comments. But are we wise enough to let go of the desires that fuel this grotesque parody? Collectively, apparently not.
Thus: thoughtful spam. Be calm. Enjoy it in moderation. And thank the Internets for all those other smart people working on better spam filters.

Add "Learn Chinese" to iGoogle
Comments 5
A lot of the spammers actually have no interest advertising to your readers. They simply want to get their link on your site so that it ends up getting a higher page rank on Google. Consider this a compliment; your blog is popular enough to affect the page ranks of sites it links to.
Posted 19 Jul 2009 at 6:53 pm ¶ha. thanks — I like it as a compliment. All I can say is they must be pretty desperate to sell that stock if they’re hoping for page rank boosts from bjshengr!
Posted 19 Jul 2009 at 7:08 pm ¶I got one of these recently. The comment was “Hi, very nice post. I have been wonder’n bout this issue,so thanks for posting”. thing is, the URI they left was just to google, so it’s hard to know the reason for the spam. My assumption was just to get me to approve one so they could spam the hell out of me later.
Alternatively it could have been a legit comment and I’m just an ass.
Posted 20 Jul 2009 at 2:42 pm ¶Hey! I can’t belive you didn’t approve my comment! I am very hert.
Posted 21 Jul 2009 at 10:15 am ¶You forgot to mention the sixth stage, stage 0: Approval!
@Klortho: sorry, I guess you just put in the wrong email address. Now that I’ve got the right one I’ll forward all the mail I’ve been getting for you. It seems to be heavy in pharmaceuticals and early-stage growth business ideas.
@Kellen: yeah, those kind of generic ones get me too. Having left some pretty dull comments myself in the past, I always have a soft spot that makes me want to approve them. Gotta say: the “wonder’n” colloquialism is a great innovation.
Posted 21 Jul 2009 at 10:27 am ¶